‘I don’t feel safe’: Guatemalans denounce anti-abortion law

Ladies’s rights advocates and LGBTQ neighborhood members say contentious laws places them at ‘excessive threat’.

Protesters march to Congress in Guatemala
Protesters march to Guatemala's Congress in opposition to the brand new 'Safety of Life and Household' regulation, on March 12, 2022 [Jeff Abbott/Al Jazeera]

Guatemala Metropolis, Guatemala – With chants of “this pro-life authorities doesn’t worth our lives”, a whole lot of individuals in the course of the weekend converged on the Guatemalan Congress to indicate their indignation at a brand new regulation they are saying threatens the rights of girls and members of the LGBTQ neighborhood.

On March 8, whereas a whole lot had been commemorating Worldwide Ladies’s Day, Guatemala’s conservative-controlled Congress authorised the “Safety of Life and Household” regulation in a 101-8 vote. There are 160 seats in Congress.

The laws labels LGBTQ folks “irregular” and prohibits the prosecution of anybody who carries out a hate crime in opposition to the neighborhood. It declares a household as one involving a married man and girl, outlaws same-sex marriage, and restricts the power of faculties or different instructional establishments to supply inclusive sexual training exterior of the nuclear household.

Abortion is already unlawful in Guatemala – with the one exception being if a being pregnant threatens the mom’s life – however the regulation additionally will increase the penalty for girls who endure the process, whether or not induced by a health care provider or resulting from a miscarriage.

“With the rise in these restrictive insurance policies and authorized initiatives, they put the LGBT+ inhabitants and girls in a scenario of excessive threat,” Homero Fuentes, a 33-year-old activist with LGBTQ rights group Visibles, advised Al Jazeera.

“These [initiatives and laws] permit hate speech to proceed to be promoted,” he stated. “This materialises in a situation of discrimination, of violence, and to the purpose of [violent] crimes.”

A protester holds a sign that reads "No to the hate law" during a march in Guatemala
A protester holds an indication that reads ‘No to the hate regulation’ throughout a march on March 12 [Jeff Abbott/Al Jazeera]

Conservative nation

A day after the regulation was authorised, Guatemala’s conservative President Alejandro Giammattei held a ceremony to declare the Central American nation “the pro-life capital of Iberoamerica”. Congress had already declared March 9 “the day to have a good time household and life”.

Guatemala is a religiously conservative nation that has largely resisted or undermined efforts to undertake progressive laws.

The regulation was initially proposed in 2017 by Congressman Anibal Rojas Espino of the conservative VIVA Social gathering. His proposal obtained an excessive amount of help from Evangelical Christians and was accompanied by 29,000 signatures from backers of the initiative.

But many components of the present laws – together with components that doubtlessly threaten constitutional rights in Guatemala – led its earlier supporters, together with the conservative Household Issues Affiliation, to boost considerations this time round.

Amid that widespread condemnation, together with from worldwide human rights teams, Giammattei on March 10 threatened to veto the regulation, urging Congress to shelve it as an alternative of forcing him to exert that presidential energy.

Forward of Giammattei’s announcement, the opposition issued an official objection to dam the laws from reaching the presidency, arguing that it violated the nation’s structure and worldwide conventions. The regulation will come below overview Tuesday.

“It's a regressive regulation in each sense,” Ligia Hernandez, a congresswoman with the opposition Movimiento Semilla (Seed Motion), advised Al Jazeera. “It impacts many individuals on this nation. They'll use this regulation to criminalise girls, and to incite hatred.”

Protesters march in Guatemala City against a strict anti-abortion law
Ladies’s rights and LGBTQ activists say the brand new regulation has worsened a way of concern [Jeff Abbott/Al Jazeera]

Sense of concern

Claudia Rosales, who works with the Sexual and Reproductive Rights Consortium, a coalition of NGOs, stated the regulation has worsened a sense of concern that already prevailed amongst girls in Guatemala.

In 2021, greater than 80 p.c of all assault complaints that girls lodged with the general public prosecutor’s workplace went uninvestigated, day by day newspaper Prensa Libre reported.

The nation additionally recorded 709 femicides final yr, in accordance with knowledge from the Mutual Help Group, recognized by the Spanish acronym GAM. The Guatemalan Human Rights Ombudsman’s workplace additionally documented at the very least 32 killings of members of the LGBTQ neighborhood in 2021, and at the very least 9 killings because the starting of 2022.

“I don’t really feel protected as a lady,” Rosales advised Al Jazeera throughout a protest in opposition to the regulation exterior of Congress on March 10.

“[Guatemala] doesn't defend girls’s lives,” she stated. “And the day one thing occurs to us, the justice system doesn't wish to give an enough, efficient, and immediate response to the issues we face.”

Regional developments

Guatemala’s regulation runs counter to a so-called “Inexperienced Wave” within the wider Latin America area in favour of decriminalising abortion, whereas marriage equality rights even have been witnessed in some international locations, resembling Chile. It additionally comes because the Giammattei administration has sought to develop nearer with US Republican lawmakers.

“We're completely defending what little rights we now have,” Ada Valenzuela, director of the Nationwide Union of Guatemalan Ladies, advised Al Jazeera in regards to the prevailing environment within the nation.

“Ladies in Guatemala we face a brand new inquisition,” she stated. “It's one which impacts us all.”

However backlash in opposition to the regulation, in addition to Giammattei’s veto risk, pushed the president of Guatemala’s Congress, Shirley Rivera, to say lawmakers would test whether or not it's constitutional.

The laws will come up for additional debate on Tuesday, whereas extra protests have been known as for that very same day, as advocates say their combat is way from over – even when this specific model of the regulation is in the end halted.

Hernandez, the opposition politician, warned: “It might be reborn at any time [under a new name].”

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post