Video shows Avalanche game-winning goal likely shouldn’t have counted

Ought to Nazem Kadri’s game-winning objective for the Avalanche in extra time to win Recreation 4 of the Stanley Cup Remaining even have counted?

With eight minutes left within the first extra time interval of the sport, Kadri took a go from Artturi Lehkonen by way of the Lightning protection and put the puck behind goaltender Andrei Vasilevskiy. After some transient confusion, the shot was dominated a objective, giving Colorado a 3-1 lead within the collection because it strikes again to residence ice for Recreation 5.

However after the sport, many on-line identified that the objective could not have been authorized. The Avalanche have been in the midst of a change when Kadri took the successful shot, and screengrabs from the scene confirmed Nathan MacKinnon could not have gotten off in time – and there have been maybe too many males on the ice.

Nazem Kadri scores the game-winning goal against Andrei Vasilevskiy
Nazem Kadri scores the game-winning objective in opposition to Andrei Vasilevskiy
Getty Pictures

It was not misplaced on these concerned, significantly Lightning coach Jon Cooper, who was “almost in tears” throughout the postgame press convention, in line with The Athletic. Cooper solely took one query and mentioned he can be accessible tomorrow.

“You’re going to see what I imply whenever you see the successful objective,” Cooper mentioned. “My coronary heart breaks for the gamers, as a result of we in all probability nonetheless ought to be enjoying.”

Within the second, Cooper didn't make clear why the objective shouldn't have counted, however chatter shortly unfold concerning the attainable further man on the ice.

Even the official rating sheet given to the media on the sport famous there have been six Colorado skaters on the ice when the objective was scored (together with the goalie). NHL curiously then edited the sheet to decrease that quantity to 5, in line with ESPN.com.

“A too many males on the ice penalty is a judgment name that may be made by any of the 4 on-ice officers,” NHL Hockey Operations mentioned in an announcement. “Following the sport, Hockey Operations met with the 4 officers as is their regular protocol. In discussing the successful objective, every of the 4 officers suggested that they didn't see a too many males on the ice state of affairs on the play.”

It seems Cooper and the Lightning have a robust case – although it’s all for naught at this level, with their season now formally on the brink. To be honest, the Lightning beat the Islanders on an identical play in final 12 months’s playoffs, en path to a Stanley Cup championship.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post