NYC woman accused of fleeing with ex’s dog claims he’s just trying to hound her

She’s barking again.

The lady accused by her ex-fiancéof fleeing the state along with his canine claims he’s spinning a tall story in an try and “strain” her — and that she’s the one who was really the pooch’s “main caregiver,” new courtroom paper exhibits.

Jenna DeMasi, 32, wrote in an affidavit Tuesday that her ex Keith Glanzman has tried to “bully and intimidate” her and that he’s utilizing the canine they co-owned to proceed hounding her following their break up.

Glanzman, 33, final month filed swimsuit towards DeMasi, claiming that after they known as off their marriage ceremony, she moved out of their Hudson Sq. pad taking his canine Frankie and an $11,500 engagement ring to her dad and mom’ house in Connecticut.

The person, Keith Glanzman, included displays of the canine and himself in addition to a photograph of his ex Jenna Demasi, leaving with the canine, a boxer beagle combine.

However DeMasi fired again Tuesday claiming that Glanzman “is making an attempt to rewrite Frankie’s historical past with us to bolster this litigation,” in keeping with the affidavit she filed within the Manhattan Supreme Court docket lawsuit.

DeMasi claims that, actually, they picked out Frankie from the adoption company collectively and that she “cared for her almost day by day ever for the reason that adoption,” her affidavit states.

“What is obvious is that [Glanzman] has tried to press false/fraudulent felony expenses, he has tried to bully and intimidate me, and he's now utilizing the presumably free companies of his older brother to strain me to settle,” she alleges.

A New York man says his ex-fiancée fled the state along with his beloved canine after the pair known as off their engagement.

Keith Glanzman

Glanzman’s brother is represented on the lawsuit by Michael Glanzman and one other lawyer, courtroom information present.

DeMasi says she discovered the furry good friend herself on-line and submitted the appliance for the canine’s adoption.

Ever since then, DeMasi chipped in for Frankie’s meals, paid for the pet insurance coverage and has taken the canine to “almost all of her vet appointments and paid for the overwhelming majority of companies,” the affidavit claims.

In the course of the pandemic, since she had been working from house, DeMasi says she was the canine’s “main caregiver.”

In his lawsuit, Glanzman mentioned that not solely does he solely personal the canine — which he adopted himself in 2017 when he was solely “casually relationship” DeMasi — however his therapist has “directed him to hunt emotional help from his canine” to assist along with his anxiousness.

However DeMasi says within the courtroom submitting that she had Frankie licensed as her emotional help canine earlier than Glanzman did.

A lawsuit was filed by Glanzman final month over who has custody of the canine following the break-up.

Keith Glanzman

DeMasi additionally alleges that Glanzman’s seizures had been “introduced on by his extreme consuming,” and that his anxiousness and wish for remedy are largely resulting from “his dishonest on me … and my issues over his infidelity,” her affidavit states.

“It's incumbent upon [Glanzman] to handle his alcohol points; it's not for Frankie to help him as he's making an attempt to take action,” the submitting states.

DeMasi alleges that Glanzman is just saying that he’d permit “visitation” with Frankie in an “try to manage me and attempt to win again my affections,” in keeping with the affidavit.

As for the engagement ring, DeMasi says she at all times deliberate to return the ring to Glanzman on the finish of their lease when she obtained the final cost of his portion of the lease. She says she advised Glanzman of her plan in an electronic mail final month.

DeMasi says has since obtained the final month’s lease and she or he plans to go away the ring at a jeweler for Glanzman to select up.

Glanzman requested a decide to grant an emergency order for DeMasi to return the canine. However the decide denied that request at a courtroom listening to Tuesday, in keeping with DeMasi’s lawyer Arlene Gold Wexler.

Gold Wexler declined to remark additional.

Whereas the emergency order was not granted, the remainder of the case will proceed to play out in courtroom over Frankie’s possession.

Glanzman mentioned, “I strenuously deny the false allegations contained in Ms. DeMasi’s affidavit.”

“I sit up for the listening to date that was set for my software for a preliminary injunction.”