We reported latest Hunter scandal two years ago — but most media still refuse to ask tough questions

On Monday, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) launched data that Hunter Biden and his uncle James Biden obtained $5 million from a Chinese language vitality agency referred to as CEFC.

Simply the Information additional experiences that this cost took the type of a zero-interest, forgivable mortgage, and although it was paid in 2017, when Joe Biden was now not vp, it coated work performed by his son and brother for the Chinese language throughout his time in workplace.

Suspicious! A bombshell!

. . . and reported by The New York Submit on Oct. 22, 2020.

We aren’t upset over credit score; removed from it. Kudos to Grassley for drawing consideration once more to this deal, and Simply the Information for mentioning the Bidens’ love of forgiving loans.

What does anger us is that it’s been over two years since The Submit reported on Hunter Biden’s shady enterprise offers, and the president — assisted by a compliant media — has by no means needed to correctly tackle the proof.

Sure, e-mails on Hunter’s laptop computer present that the Chinese language paid the Biden household not less than $5 million, a truth confirmed by former enterprise associate Tony Bobulinski. One of many messages The Submit printed again then had one other associate, James Gilliar, telling Bobulinski on Could 20, 2017, “Don’t point out Joe being concerned, it’s solely when u are nose to nose, I do know u know that however they're paranoid.”

Don’t bear in mind studying that? Maybe as a result of when this newspaper reported it, it was throughout a two-week interval that Twitter banned us and Fb prevented the sharing of our articles. And on the similar time, 50 liberal former intelligence officers declared our reporting “doubtless Russian disinformation” based mostly on no proof — which the liberal media used as an excuse to both ignore or insult us.

After all the laptop computer was actual, a truth solely “confirmed” by The New York Instances, The Washington Submit and others after Joe Biden was safely elected.

However whereas they grudgingly admitted the drive’s authenticity, doubtless as a result of Hunter is going through attainable tax evasion and gun prices, they by no means pressed Joe Biden on key questions:

  • What work did James and Hunter do whereas Joe Biden was vp that warranted tens of millions of dollars in funds from a Chinese language agency? Did Joe Biden use his place to assist their enterprise?
  • What kind of guarantees did Hunter and James supply CEFC? Neither has a background in vitality, or actual property, or actually something. Hunter was coping with well-documented drug issues. What precisely had been the Chinese language shopping for?
  • The CEFC deal promised 10% “to the massive man,” in accordance with e-mails, which has been confirmed to be Joe Biden. Was Joe Biden given 10% of that $5 million?
  • Joe Biden nonetheless claims he “by no means” mentioned enterprise with Hunter Biden. So is he denying he met with Bobulinski to debate the deal, as Bobulinski says on the report? Does he deny he’s “the massive man”? If Joe Biden knew nothing about James and Hunter’s negotiations, why was he getting a monetary stake within the deal? Does he anticipate us to imagine any of this?

We’re happy to see that Republicans like Grassley nonetheless need solutions, and that some reporters see Joe Biden’s efforts to wave away Hunter’s issues as ones of habit somewhat than corruption as nonsense. However don’t overlook that Massive Tech, the liberal media and biased authorities officers have spent two years operating interference for the Bidens.

This materials isn’t new. It’s simply been coated up.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post