Dave Portnoy, the founding father of Barstool Sports activities, accused the New York Instances of operating a "hit piece" geared toward making him appear like a "scumbag."
Zuffa LLC
Barstool Sports activities founder Dave Portnoy accused the New York Instances of publishing a “hit piece” about his ties to sports activities betting in an effort to painting him as a “scumbag.”
The Instances ran a narrative over the weekend that quotes playing business watchdogs who accuse the Barstool founding father of recklessly advising his followers to wager their “home, youngsters, [and] household” on a single sport.
Portnoy claims that the Grey Girl failed to offer him satisfactory alternative to touch upon a narrative whose goal was to “construct a case towards me.”
The Instances story famous that Portnoy — who has described himself as a “degenerate gambler” and whose sports activities betting firm, Barstool Sportsbook, is looking for a license to function in a number of states — is being scrutinized by regulators who're mentioned to be involved about allegations of sexual misconduct and misogynistic habits.
Earlier this month, a federal choose tossed a defamation lawsuit by filed Portnoy towards Insider.com after it printed a pair of articles detailing sexual encounters he had with a number of nameless younger girls.
Portnoy informed Fox Information’ Tucker Carlson on Monday that he had provided to do a face-to-face interview with the creator of the Instances story, reporter Emily Metal, seven months in the past.
The Instances disputes Portnoy’s claims, saying Portnoy was the one who refused to offer remark after the newspaper declined his request to video-record the interview session with Metal.
“Greater than per week earlier than the article printed, we introduced Mr. Portnoy with a chance to reply detailed questions associated to our reporting, which was thorough and fact-based,” a Instances spokesperson informed The Publish.
“Regardless of our supply, he declined to offer any solutions, and has but to problem any details in our reporting.”
Portnoy, nonetheless, disputes this.
“Once I heard about [Steel’s story back in April], I mentioned, ‘Let’s sit down — open-book. I'll reply any query you've got,'” Portnoy informed Carlson.
“‘I don’t care what your politics are, the way you sit — I'm the witness of a narrative you're engaged on for principally a yr and I'm saying: “I'll sit down with you. You may ask me something.” I’m not saying, “Legal professionals within the room.” No one, simply me.'”
Portnoy informed Carlson that Metal “had no curiosity” in assembly him regardless of reminding her weeks later of his supply for a sit-down.
“She went ghost, crickets,” Portnoy mentioned of Metal. “I didn’t hear from her for seven months.”
In line with Portnoy, Metal despatched him a listing of questions simply 48 hours earlier than the Instances would go on to publish its story about Barstool Sportsbook. Metal mentioned she despatched over questions not less than seven days earlier than the story ran.
“We wish all these solutions to all these allegations in 48 hours,” Portnoy mentioned, accusing the Instances of “attempting to make the case that I’m a scumbag and sway folks.”
“[Steel] by no means had curiosity in telling the reality,” Portnoy mentioned. “All she needed to do was construct a case towards me.”
“She by no means needed to listen to how we do accountable gaming and coaching at our firm,” Portnoy mentioned.
“It was all a success piece and he or she had little interest in listening to my aspect of the story.”
The Publish has sought remark from Metal and the Instances.
On Twitter, Metal accused Portnoy of posting a doctored video of their textual content exchanges.
“I emailed Dave Portnoy an in depth record of questions on my article greater than per week earlier than it ran,” Metal tweeted.
“I made a number of makes an attempt to listen to his perspective. He posted an edited video about my reporting.”
The Instances’ public relations arm launched an announcement backing Metal.
“Over per week earlier than this story printed, we introduced Mr. Portnoy a chance to reply detailed questions on our reporting, which was thorough and fact-based,” the Instances mentioned.
“Though he declined to offer any solutions, we included his sentiment within the story itself, regardless of his claims on the contrary.”
The newspaper added: “The change he shows right here was captured on Nov. 15 and doesn't embody different, repeated efforts to have interaction with Mr. Portnoy or our supply to permit him extra time to reply, which he ignored.”
Post a Comment