The Subject: Mayor Adams’ plan to take mentally ailing homeless folks into custody for psychiatric analysis.
Heaven is aware of I’ve been crucial of Mayor Adams and his insurance policies since his election, however his newest coverage initiative of eradicating harmful folks from New York Metropolis streets is actually a step in the correct path and an effort that’s a very long time coming (“Eric ‘fearless’ on homeless,” Dec. 2).
Figuring out that these violent folks on the road are a hazard to themselves or others appears a simple name to me, and to these different New Yorkers who're being changed into victims.
The once-lucrative vacationer trade has taken a pointy hit lately over security issues. Now let’s see if the mayor and governor can see these initiatives by.
Dennis Kerbis
Staten Island
Adams is lastly making an attempt to assist the mentally ailing homeless. If the plan is accepted, these poor souls will probably be taken off the road and mandated for remedy.
I absolutely perceive what the homeless are going by. I actually was homeless in 1975 after my launch from the US Navy on the finish of the Vietnam Conflict. At one level, I considered taking my very own life.
My state of affairs modified, and I did get assist due the kindness of a stranger and associates. I additionally acquired assist from social companies. I discovered assist bodily and mentally. So, to Adams: Kudos for caring for the mentally ailing homeless.
Frederick Bedell
Bellerose
The lacking hyperlink in treating the mentally unstable has by no means been addressed correctly — and that's the follow-up.
Simply as we observe instances involving kids, we have to do this with the grownup mentally ailing. In instances of homeless mentally ailing, the duty is more difficult.
Whereas there has all the time been a tug-of-war between public security and the rights of individuals dealing with involuntarily custody, we can not proceed with out an try at rational intervention. A job drive must be convened to find out the easiest way going ahead.
Phil Serpico
Queens
The article about Adams deciding to have the dangerously mentally ailing involuntarily dedicated was nice however forgot to say one thing: Why would New Yorkers put a Democrat answerable for an issue that the Democrats created?
The rationale we have now so many lunatics on the streets is that Democrats handed the legal guidelines making it doable. Now you'll belief them to repair their errors?
Tom Scott
Spotswood, NJ
The Subject: Proposed laws that would supply funds for authorized assist for migrants combating deportation.
It’s fascinating that two Democratic lawmakers, representatives who're alleged to be stewards of our tax dollars, waited till after the election to point they're proposing laws for New Yorkers to pay as a lot as $300 million for the authorized charges required to assist unlawful immigrants keep on this nation (“Bid for NY authorized charges vs. deport,” Dec. 1).
Shouldn’t our ethical obligation be at the beginning to these people who find themselves residents of this nation, like our veterans or these residents out of a job or a house?
Need to know why New Yorkers are leaving in droves? It’s due to idiots like these two lawmakers, proposing ludicrous laws that's destroying the town and state.
J. Paino
Manhattan
Simply the place does it cease? State Sen. Brad Hoylman and Assemblywoman Catalina Cruz have discovered one other technique to pander for future votes.
They now need to set up a program the place we the taxpayers must pay the authorized charges of unlawful immigrants.
Now we have folks sleeping on the streets now, with no housing. How about taking good care of them?
Kim Cody
Whitestone
Need to weigh in on as we speak’s tales? Ship your ideas (alongside together with your full identify and metropolis of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are topic to enhancing for readability, size, accuracy and magnificence.
Post a Comment