Very similar to many on the web, Dolphins coach Mike McDaniel additionally expressed disbelief at a controversial roughing the passer name in his crew’s 23-17 loss to the Chargers on “Sunday Night time Soccer.”
Through the second half of the sport, wherein the Chargers led 17-7 at halftime, Dolphins linebacker Jaelan Phillips sacked quarterback Justin Herbert on a 3rd down. The officers referred to as a penalty on Phillips’ sort out, giving the Chargers a contemporary set of downs consequently.
Moments later, cameras panned to McDaniel, who couldn’t assist however chortle on the ruling, which was deemed all the pieces from “absurd” to “terrible.”
“Absurd roughing the passer name. Absurd,” Cardinals defensive finish J.J. Watt tweeted.
Corridor of Famer Shannon Sharpe wasn’t a fan of the decision, both.
“That’s a HORSE 💩 name. Simply AWFUL,” Sharpe seethed, whereas Pat McAfee remarked, “Man… soccer does look totally different today doesn’t it.”
Sunday’s questionable name is the most recent in what’s grow to be a season stuffed with quizzical penalties. Again in October, two calls drew the ire of the NFL group inside days of one another, starting with a Week 5 matchup between the Buccaneers and Falcons.
When Falcons defensive sort out Grady Jarrett dropped Buccaneers quarterback Tom Brady for what might have been a 10-yard loss, the previous was flagged, with referee Jerome Boger alleging Jarrett “unnecessarily” tossed Brady to the bottom.
Hours after the Buccaneers’ controversial win, Chiefs defensive sort out Chris Jones was penalized throughout an AFC West showdown in opposition to the Raiders when he got here from behind to sort out quarterback Derek Carr and power a fumble. The play might have given the Chiefs a positive discipline place, however the Raiders maintained possession as an alternative.
The NFL could have tweaked the roughing the passer rule forward of the 2022 season, wherein a defender should not “land on prime of him [a passer] with all or many of the defender’s weight,” however after this yr’s onslaught of controversial penalties, the mind belief could have to return to the drafting board.
Post a Comment