The week in whoppers: NY Times’ scaremongering, Eric Adams’ anti-science and more

Diary of disturbing disinformation and harmful delusions

This remark:

“My downside with Hunter Biden’s laptop computer is that he’s completely irrelevant. It’s not whether or not it’s disinformation . . . I don’t suppose Hunter Biden’s enterprise relationships have something to do with who needs to be president . . . So I don’t discover it to be attention-grabbing.”

— Pulitzer-winning Atlantic author Anne Applebaum, April 6, when requested if the media acted inappropriately by dismissing The Put up’s Oct. 2020 tales about Hunter Biden’s laptop computer

We are saying: OMG. 1) The media didn’t simply ignore the Hunter laptop computer story as a result of it was not “attention-grabbing”; it (falsely) screamed that it was “Russian disinformation.” 2) Information isn’t what Anne Applebaum finds related however what People do — and the truth that 17% of Joe Biden voters say they wouldn’t have voted for him in the event that they’d heard the story exhibits that, in reality, a lot of the general public would’ve favored to have heard about it. 3) And that’s as a result of it was related, because it uncovered mountains of Biden household corruption. 4) If Applebaum doesn’t even discover the Hunter laptop computer story at the very least “attention-grabbing,” she’s clearly within the fallacious enterprise. Assume she’d care if it had been a Republican’s son?


This story:

An article in the New York Times questioned if New Yorkers should start to be concerned about the slight rise in COVID cases.
An article in The New York Instances questioned if New Yorkers ought to begin to be involved concerning the rise in COVID instances.
NY Put up composite / istock/ Getty Photographs

We are saying: Will the Grey Woman ever transfer on? Sure, instances are “ticking up” in components of town, however COVID hospitalizations have averaged solely 20 a day over the previous week and have been dropping; deaths have averaged simply three and are additionally lowering. Scaring the general public would possibly promote papers and entice clicks, however sooner or later even the Instances must acknowledge the pandemic is over.


This column:

A Bloomberg column suggested that Elon Musk's stake in Twitter could be bad for free speech.
A Bloomberg column instructed that Elon Musk’s stake in Twitter could possibly be unhealthy without spending a dime speech.
NY Put up composite / istock/ Getty Photographs

We are saying: Bloomberg author Timothy L. O’Brien  is clearly fretting that liberals will lose their monopoly over speech now that billionaire Elon Musk, who’s railed about social-media management of it, has purchased a 9.2% stake in Twitter and joined its board.


This clarification:

“There isn't any different metropolis like New York Metropolis. If we gauge our reactions, behaviors, based mostly on different cities, we'll make a giant mistake.”

— Mayor Eric Adams, April 5, when requested why Gotham is the one metropolis within the world to masks toddlers, provided that there are zero pediatric COVID instances in metropolis hospitals

We are saying: That’s a solution? Disregard the science — the truth that youngsters beneath 5 are at near-zero threat and that masking them does extra hurt than good (even the World Well being Group says toddlers don’t want masks and ought to by no means put on them for an extended length) — and drive youngsters to masks . . . simply to be totally different? If Adams goes to impose such a dangerous, anti-science coverage, he wants a greater clarification.


This tweet:

We are saying:Use each software to guard you from Putin’s value hike? Please. President Biden’s been utilizing “each software” to maintain his vow to “eradicate” fossil fuels — killing pipelines, banning new drilling leases on federal land, discouraging funding . . . which is why the hovering value of fuel is absolutely extra Biden’s value hike than Putin’s.

— Compiled by The Put up Editorial Board

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post