Are they in too Depp?
Johnny Depp’s notoriously diehard followers are dragging certainly one of Amber Heard’s witnesses on-line following Monday’s testimonies.
After practising psychiatrist Dr. David R. Spiegel testified on behalf of Heard’s crew in opposition to Depp, folks started flooding his WebMD web page with scathing one-star evaluations.
Spiegel testified that Depp “has behaviors which might be in line with somebody that each has substance-use dysfunction in addition to behaviors of somebody who's a perpetrator of intimate-partner violence.”
When Depp’s attorneys questioned simply how Spiegel may be certain of his conclusions with out having had contact with the 58-year-old film star, the psychiatrist mentioned he was denied.
After he testified, religious #JusticeforJohnnyDepp posters spammed Spiegel’s medical web page with damaging feedback and evaluations, calling him “unprofessional” and an “fool.”
“Based mostly on his loopy testimony and unusual habits throughout the Depp-Heard trial, I worry for any affected person in his ‘care,'” wrote one hater. “A narcissist, a fraud and an smug fool.”
“Looks like you simply needed to be on TV. Rambled nonsense your complete time, dodged each query, extraordinarily aggressive, ignorant, diagnosing folks with out even assembly them,” commented another person. “To not be point out calling Mr. Depp an ‘fool.'”
Some evaluations had been screenshotted and posted to Twitter by NBC reporter Kat Tenbarge, which amassed almost 25,000 likes on the platform, going viral.
However some Heard supporters had been fast to chunk again on the subpar evaluations, saying Spiegel did a “implausible job” testifying.
“All these one star evaluations should not associated to affected person care,” commented one individual. “They're opinions of viewers watching the Johnny Depp trial. Perhaps discover one other place to vent your frustrations.”
“It was troublesome to look at as Johnny Depp’s counsel mocked him all through. It was like eighth grade bullies. Shameless. Unprofessional. Physician Spiegel is a hero for talking up for Amber Heard,” wrote one other, who decried the web hate Depp followers had been spreading on the medical web page.
However Spiegel isn’t the primary Heard witness to face backlash for taking the stand. Earlier this month, medical psychologist Daybreak Hughes acquired damaging evaluations on a WebMD web page that featured her identify and apply, in line with NBC Information.
“Doesn’t consider males could be victims of abuse,” one evaluation mentioned. “Excessive biased. Guess she’ll discredit victims only for cash.”
But, on the WedMD web page, it seems many evaluations have since been deleted.
This isn’t Depp followers’ solely very public show of fandom, although. They’ve been showing in droves to supported the beloved actor, even tenting out in entrance of the courthouse to safe a front-row seat within the courtroom. Some even spent upwards of $30,000 on journey bills to witness the trial in individual.
Pressure between followers on each side stays excessive as Heard supporters accuse Depp advocates of misogyny and sexism.
“All Amber’s strikes on the stand are being dissected, and the victim-blaming happening proper now signifies that if she cries, she’s appearing, and if she doesn’t cry, then she wasn’t abused,” Sara, a Heard fan who needed her final identify withheld, instructed Insider. “It’s means greater than simply Johnny Depp and Amber Heard.”
Depp is suing ex-wife Heard, 36, to the tune of $50 million for defamation following the publication of Heard’s 2018 Washington Put up op-ed. In it, she known as herself a “public determine representing home abuse.” Whereas she by no means instantly named Depp, he claims it devastated his profession and popularity, costing him tens of millions of dollars in work.
In 2020, Heard countersued Depp for $100 million, saying he defamed her when his lawyer instructed the press she had made up the abuse allegations.
Post a Comment